Event/s
This presentation takes as its starting point the work of Harun Farocki and Trevor Paglen on the rise of the “operational image” to consider the related rise of what might be described as automatic or “operationalized” listening. This type of listening is becoming increasingly familiar thanks to the deployment of “smart speakers” and a growing array of networked audio sensors (from gunshot sensors to workplace monitors, smart phones, and audio surveillance on public transport). The talk describes the stakes of operationalism as the displacement of symbolic interpretation by action, and draws on psychoanalytic theory to consider the implications for subjectivity. The goal of the talk, then, is to raise the question regarding what is lost in the shift from comprehension and interpretation to operation. What does it mean to say that Alexa will gather information about your words but it doesn’t know what you mean (beyond purely operational commands)? The talk makes some speculative claims about the emergence of a world in which symbolic efficiency is replaced by operational efficiency. This is, perhaps needless to say, a fundamentally undemocratic process that is already becoming all-too familiar in these post-truth, post-deliberative, post-political times.
Tue, 24. Jul–
Sun, 28. Oct
2018
EAVESDROPPING used to be a crime. According to William Blackstone, in his Commentaries on the Laws of England (1769): ‘eavesdroppers, or such as listen under walls or windows, or the eaves of a house, to hearken after discourse, and thereupon to frame slanderous and mischievous tales, are a common nuisance and presentable at the court-leet.’ Two hundred and fifty years later, eavesdropping isn’t just legal, it’s ubiquitous. What was once a minor public order offence has become one of the most important politico-legal problems of our time, as the Snowden revelations made abundantly clear. Eavesdropping: the ever-increasing access to, capture and control of our sonic worlds by state and corporate interests.
But eavesdropping isn’t just about big data, surveillance and security. We all overhear. Listening itself is excessive. We cannot help but hear too much, more than we mean to. Eavesdropping, in this sense, is the condition – or the risk – of sociality per se, so that the question is not whether to eavesdrop, but the ethics and politics of doing so. This project pursues an expanded definition of eavesdropping therefore, one that includes contemporary mechanisms for listening-in but also activist practices of listening back, that is concerned with malicious listenings but also the responsibilities of the earwitness.
This project directs our attention towards specific technologies (audio-tape, radio-telescope, networked intelligence) and politics (surveillance, settler colonialism, detention). Some contributions address the personal and intimate, others are more distant or forensic. Their scale ranges from the microscopic to the cosmic, from the split-second to the interminable. What all the artists and thinkers involved have in common, however, is a concern not just for sound or listening, but what it might mean for someone or something to be listened-to.
Movement 1: Overhear (July 24–August 5)
wiretapping, the sonic episteme, sonic agency,
excessive listening, forensic listening
Movement 2: Silicon ear (Aug 9–11)
big data, automation, algorithmic listening,
panacousticism
Movement 3: Earwitness (August 20–31)
the sonic colour line, sonic warfare, listening to history, the hearing, justice as improvisation
Movement 4: Listen Back (Oct 19-28)
Movement 1: Overhear
Movement 2: Silicon ear
Movement 3: Earwitness
Movement 4: Listen Back